Home Random Thoughts Short pieces Long pieces Talk to Me

Long pieces

THE BEGINNING AND THE COSMIC EVOLUTION ( Page 5 )

Theories may come to support or disprove these views but we wont be here to verify these. The relevant question I wish to bring out here is whether such a state of affairs will anyway affect the views I have presented here about the metaphysical nature of cosmic evolution? Will such developments affect my faith? There is an unequivocal negative as answer to this. Scientific views on the nature, creation or evolution of our universe could be changing and unsure. The theological view is never changing. The view the people the world over had held from the earliest times of human existence, the view that the universe and everything in it are the work of a creator will always hold true. Nor am I here trying to defend God. He needs no defence, no apology, not the least from me.
Fusion Reactors
For the last 50 years or so scientists have gone out of their way to invent an economical or practical fusion reactor, the only possible source of plentiful clean energy that the world need so much. The existing nuclear reactors that supply the power for many cities, ships and submarines work on the principle of nuclear fission, or splitting the nucleus of heavy elements like plutonium and Uranium. These leave so much radioactive waste, very harmful and impossible to dispose off. The fusion reactors on the other hand work on the principle of the fusion of hydrogen or deuterium atoms to form nuclei of heavier atoms like helium or lithium. These would leave no radioactive waste like the fission reactors, no pollutants like the thermal power plants and no ecological problem like the hydroelectric power plants. In both fission and fusion some small fraction of the matter involved in the nuclear reactions is converted into energy according to the equation E = mc2. Though the scientists or engineers could not produce such reactors on a viable scale there is no shortage of these in nature at large. Every star including our sun is a fusion reactor that produces energy and creates heavier atoms all the time.
The observations on the nature of the cosmic background microwave radiation tell us that the porridge of matter at the end of the first phase of inflation was not smooth but very lumpy. The small lumps formed what are the galactic clusters of today and the big lumps formed the super clusters of galaxies. Further expansion of this porridge of matter made empty spaces, first between the lumps and later, within the lumps. Gravity took control and the first proto-galaxies and stars were born. The first generation stars were made exclusively of hydrogen and helium. As gravitational forces brought this small lump of matter closer and denser the pressures and temperatures soared to such heights that nuclear fusion reactions began in earnest and these stars began to shine with ever increasing brightness, emitting all bands of electromagnetic spectrum from radio waves at one end to X-rays at the other. In this process, these stars, these fusion reactors, while giving out heat, light and other forms of energy were also going into full-scale production as the factories producing the other heavier elements. The heavy elements like iron and nickel are produced in the second-generation stars born out of the debris of the first generation stars. Our sun is a third-generation star. The very heavy elements like iodine gold or uranium are not formed even in the most massive of the third generation stars according to the latest observations. Scientists attribute the creation of these to neutron star collisions. But we may come to it in another context

THE SUBLIME TRUTH ( Page 1)

“He who believes in truth believes in God.” Gandhi
“ Truth? What is that?” About two thousand years have passed since Pilate put this question to Jesus. And this question was prompted by a statement made by Jesus when he said “For this I came into this world; that I may bear witness to truth.” From the nature of Pilate’s question and from the way he behaved after asking the question it was quite obvious that a reply was not expected. That is probably why Jesus did not give an answer to the question then. Our loss! Even if Jesus had given a reply one should wonder if Pilate or anyone else present there would have understood the meaning and depth of the reply. Even the disciples, who were with Jesus for two years on a full-time basis, could not understand much of what he wanted to communicate to them. Is our plight much different? How well do we, who had been learning and teaching the words of Jesus for the last two thousand years, understand his message? Today if you put the question, “ What is it that Jesus came to bear witness to?” to the leaders or theologians of the various denominations of Christendom what a rich variety of often irrelevant and mutually contradictory answers can we expect? If we put the question: “what is truth” to people of various persuasions what a variety of answers can we expect?
A verse from ancient Indian Scriptures that comes to mind while thinking of truth goes like this: “The truth on this earth is hidden under a gold bowl”. This is a very old line and I wonder if this has not lost much, if not all, of its relevance in today’s world. The line implies that if you try and succeed in removing the bowl we can reach the truth. Sadly that is not the case today. For most people today truth is not something under the bowl. It is the material with which the bowl is made - gold. For them there is only one truth in the world - money. All the rest is falsehood or humbug. They have faith in only one thing - wealth. They do not believe in anything else.