Home Random Thoughts Short pieces Long pieces Talk to Me

Short pieces

‘NEW-AGE’ CHRISTIAN GROUPS ( Page 1 )
The fragmentation of the western Christian church that began with Martin Luther in the 16th century has continued steadily with the result of us having today a thousand churches. What caused the initial split was the refusal of the church authorities to listen to the ‘less superior’ prelates and the failure of the church to move with the times. Today there is a similar situation that is causing large numbers of youth to leave their mother churches – the mainline churches- and join ‘new-age groups’ like ‘born again’, to be ‘saved’ or to ‘receive Christ’. No one can say that the main line churches of today have the same attitude as that existed in the sixteenth century. Far from it. But still the churches haven’t moved with the times. This exodus from churches could be attributed to the following.
While catering for religious life, the churches does very little to cater for the spiritual growth of the faithful. So much importance is given to rituals, sacraments and rote recitation of prayers and hymns and not enough for the spiritual needs.
At a time when the Jewish and other religions were God-centered Christ tried to introduce the concept of a man-centered, humanistic, religion. But today the mainline churches are neither man-centered nor God-centered. They are clergy-centered. It is as if the church is ‘of the clergy, by the clergy, for the clergy’. Certain all-Kerala leaders of youth movements like the C L C as well as common parishioners have voiced their complaints at the way they are treated by even very junior priests who somehow appear to have the notion that they share the power of ‘infallibility and omniscience’ of the Almighty.
Unlike in the recent and distant past, the people especially the youth of today have felt the need for spiritual growth and a new life. When their mother churches could not cater for this need they turned to these ‘new- age groups and churches’. The fact that most of these groups do not have priests or bishops points to the antagonism of these people towards the dictatorship of the clergy against which they revolted.
Fundamentalism of the fringe groups
Fanaticism as well as fundamentalism starts when people insist that the scriptures must be taken literally though reason is against it. Those who insist on this should be able to explain some apparent contradictions that we come across in the Bible.
E.g. Genesis 1 states that man was created after all the fish, birds and animals were created. Genesis 2 says that first man was made and then for his sake all other creatures were made. One cannot believe both literally.
Or again, Paul says that Faith alone saves. But James says that faith without actions is dead. Which view should we take?